🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is claiming damages totaling $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a direct warning from the Kremlin regarding plans to use immobilized Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on reports in Russian news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

EU leaders will determine later this week regarding a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and economic needs.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the main keeper for the Kremlin's immobilised sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union authorities have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the fact that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has labeled any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of reciprocal actions, such as seizing EU private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a prominent role in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its assets. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

With statements interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a severe attack on property rights and the international reserves system created by the United States."

Euroclear refused to provide a statement on the new legal action. It has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

Although judges in European nations are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian courts, experts anticipate Moscow to seek implementation in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that relevant holdings can be located," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials said they are working on steps to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European entities. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would solely be obligated to return the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay reparations for the immense destruction inflicted during the ongoing conflict.

Alternative Proposals

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative method for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she remarked. "It also sends a powerful signal that if you cause all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."